Heart Device Recall Lawsuit News | |
Ask a Heart Device Recall Lawyer,
|
Ask a Heart Device Recall Lawyer, "Do I have a Case?" : Heart Device Recall Blog : December 2005
As a result of a series of recalls, which seem never to end, Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa amd chairman of the Senate Finance Committee has begun to question whether the company violated a 2003 agreement requiring them to alert the FDA of product problems.
More than 170,000 units have been recalled.December 8, 2005 09:11 Another 70,000 units have been added to those identified for reall. It seems to never end. Guidant has been under fire since they delayed issuing information about known defects and in fact actually continued to sell units with known defects.
Boston Scientific Recalls Heart DevicesDecember 9, 2005 06:49 "Boston Scientific Corp. said on Thursday it is voluntarily recalling all of its Flextome Cutting Balloon systems, products used to help cut through fatty deposits in heart arteries, because of a malfunction that could require additional surgery. The company said it was recalling about 40,000 devices and said the move does not affect patients who have received treatment with the recalled devices." Reuters, 12/8/05
Important Safety Information on Medtronic Sigma Series pacemakersDecember 12, 2005 08:45
Medtronic is informing physicians of a potential risk in a subset of pacemakers. Patients with Sigma pacemakers who experience a return of symptoms should seek medical attention.
UPDATE: Guidant VENTAK PRIZM 2 DR and CONTAK RENEW AL Implantable Cardioverter DefibrillatorsDecember 30, 2005 07:52
Guidant VENTAK PRIZM 2 DR and CONTAK RENEWAL Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators [Posted 07/18/2005] FDA issued a Preliminary Public Health Notification and advice for patients for Guidant VENTAK PRIZM 2 DR and CONTAK RENEWAL Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators to provide clinicians with current information and guidance concerning malfunctions occurring with these devices, which were the subjects of a Class I recall announced by FDA on July 1, 2005. The malfunction that is the subject of the recall causes damage to the device’s circuitry, potentially resulting in the inability to deliver the required shock during episodes of arrhythmia. This malfunction could lead to a serious, life-threatening event. Importantly, the device does not give any sign of impending failure, and there is no test that predicts whether any particular device will fail. The affected devices are:
|

Home | Site Map | Disclaimer